aBK3I4745

Bike stations with sensors and maintenance facilities

General Description

A new car free area for pedestrians and cyclists is created, offering improved cycling infrastructure for visitors, to encourage active travel, reduce air pollution, encourage green mobility and urban regeneration.

Timeline to reach full potential

2-5 years

Co-benefits & spatial impact assessment

Co-creation roadmap

Lessons learnt

Co-creation process

  • Bike users have specific preferences for cycling infrastructure: bike users asked for U shaped stands, as they are “better for the bicycles and the bike users”. Also suggested that parking facilities could incorporate e-bike, e-scooter charging facilities.
  • What information to monitor and share: Stakeholders supportive of displaying previously developed cycling maps on the monitors.

  • Ensuring safe access for both cyclists and pedestrians: Signage and use of colour to mark pedestrian and cycle paths discussed with stakeholders. Possibility of resurfacing the area to make it more pedestrian and cyclist friendly also discussed although this was budget contingent – this highlights the importance of clearly communicating with stakeholders and managing expectations for the feasibility of certain interventions.

Implementation process

General
  • Design Changes During Preparation Stage: Changes to the initial concept design occurred during the preparation stage due to input from stakeholders and technical issues. Flexibility in the design phase is critical to accommodate unforeseen challenges and feedback.

  • Technical Challenges Impact Design: Technical issues necessitated changes in the design, underscoring the importance of thorough technical assessments during the planning phase to prevent delays or redesigns later.

  • Budget Variances Due to External Factors and Unforeseen Costs

  • External factors: such as market conditions and inflation, along with unforeseen costs, contributed to a significant budget variance (±20%). This highlights the need for a contingency plan and flexible budget forecasting to accommodate unexpected expenses

  • Revisiting the Preparation and Procurement Stages

  • Reflecting on the process: The preparation and procurement stages could have been approached differently. Enhanced focus on these stages would likely improve clarity, planning, and resource allocation, minimizing delays and unexpected costs.

Level of required expertise - in house
Level of required expertise - contractors

Sustainability plan

Replication potential

KEY INFO

SDG

Digital Solutions

  • Microclimate monitoring
  • Noise pollution monitoring
  • Air quality monitoring
  • Visitor tracking
  • Data hosting and visualisation
  • Health tracking
  • Energy efficient technologies

Socio - cultural Solutions

  • Civil Infrastructure
  • Knowledge sharing

Participatory planning potential

Medium

CAPEX

OPEX

SROI

1 : 4,28

Ecosystem Services

Complexity

Low

KPIs

Main Beneficiaries

  • Local Administrations

  • Local Community
  • Disadvantaged groups or minorities
  • School Community
  • Cultural/Art Producers
  • Local businesses

  • Urban & Spatial Planning
  • Engineers & Technical Experts
  • Environmental & Natural Sciences

Health and Well - Being Aspects

  • Mental health enhancement
  • Physiological health enhancement
  • Enhancement of quality of life
  • Enhancement of physical activity

Download this VS profile as pdf

Comments are closed.